The World Anti-Doping Agency (Wada) says it is “very alarmed” after fresh allegations of suspected doping emerged in a leak of test data.

The

Sunday Times 

and German broadcaster ARD/WRD have obtained access to the results of 12,000 blood tests from 5,000 athletes.

According to the newspaper, the evidence – which has been seen by the BBC – reveals the “extraordinary extent of cheating” by athletes at the world’s biggest events.

Wada’s independent commission will investigate the claims in the ARD/WRD documentary

Doping – Top Secret: The Shadowy World of Athletics. 

Wada president Sir Craig Reedie said his organisation was “very disturbed by these new allegations… which will, once again, shake the foundation of clean athletes worldwide”.

The files belong to world governing body the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF), but have been leaked by a whistle-blower.

The Sunday Times and ARD/WRD used two of the world’s “foremost anti-doping experts”, scientists Robin Parisotto and Michael Ashenden, to review the data.

According to the experts, the database reveals:

• A third of medals (146, including 55 golds) in endurance events at the Olympics and World Championships between 2001 and 2012 were won by athletes who have recorded suspicious tests. It is claimed none of these athletes have been stripped of their medals.
• More than 800 athletes – one in seven of those named in the files – have recorded blood tests described by one of the experts as “highly suggestive of doping or at the very least abnormal”.
• A top UK athlete is among seven Britons with suspicious blood scores.
• British athletes – including Olympic champion heptathlete Jessica Ennis-Hill – have lost out in major events to competitors who were under suspicion.
• Ten medals at London 2012 were won by athletes who have dubious test results.
• In some finals, every athlete in the three medal positions had recorded a suspicious blood test.
• Russia emerges as “the blood testing epicentre of the world” with more than 80% of the country’s medals won by suspicious athletes, while Kenya had 18 medals won by suspicious athletes.
• Stars such as Britain’s Mo Farah and Jamaican sprinter Usain Bolt recorded no abnormal results.
• Athletes are increasingly using blood transfusions and EPO micro-doses to boost the red cell count.

Parisotto said: “Never have I seen such an alarmingly abnormal set of blood values. So many athletes appear to have doped with impunity, and it is damning that the IAAF appears to have idly sat by and let this happen.”

According to Ashenden, the files show that athletics is now in the same “diabolical position” as cycling during the Lance Armstrong era. He said it was “a shameful betrayal of [the IAAF’s] primary duty to police their sport and to protect clean athletes”.

The evidence is not proof of doping – but the revelations will raise more serious questions over whether the sport is doing enough to combat cheating ahead of the World Athletics Championships in Beijing later this month.

The IAAF is due to elect a new president in just over two weeks, with Britain’s Lord Coe the favourite to win the election against Sergey Bubka. Coe has made independent testing

a key part of his manifesto.

The IAAF, which has not disputed the authenticity of the database, told the Sunday Times: “The IAAF has always been at the forefront in combating anti-doping, searching and implementing new analytical techniques and methodologies.”

It said that before the introduction in 2009 of the

biological passport 

– which monitors longitudinal blood values – its testers had “systematically pursued” all results that were deemed “atypical” with immediate urine tests for EPO and then target-tested those athletes in and out of competition.

Since the introduction of the passport, the IAAF says it has “pursued more cases under the passport system than all other anti-doping organisations together”, and is spending $2m a year on combating cheating. “As a percentage of overall annual budget this is the highest of any sport,” it added.

There can be various reasons for abnormal blood samples other than performance-enhancing drugs. Illness, altitude training and pregnancy can all influence values.

The latest claims come after a turbulent few months for athletics.

In December,

ARD/WRD alleged systematic doping in Russian athletics

and implicated the IAAF in covering up the problem. The Russian Athletics Federation called the allegations lies, and IAAF president Lamine Diack denied any collusion, although he did

admit to the BBC that his sport was “in crisis”.

Both the IAAF and Wada are investigating the allegations.

The German documentary-makers also claimed an unnamed member of the IAAF medical commission had a list of 150 suspicious blood samples from 2001 to 2008 that were not investigated. Diack described this as “ridiculous”.

The IAAF insisted that the whistle-blower would not have known if follow-up tests had been conducted and pointed out that its athlete biological passport scheme was only launched in 2009 and samples before that date did “not have the same level of reliability and strength as the post-2009 values which were collected under strict and stringent conditions”.

In June, the BBC’s Panorama programme alleged that

Mo Farah’s coach Alberto Salazar violated various anti-doping rules

with other athletes. He denies the allegations, and there is no suggestion that double Olympic champion Farah was guilty of any wrongdoing. UK Anti-Doping and the US Anti-Doping Agency are

investigating the claims.

Although it was one of the first sports to introduce the biological passport, athletics has a chequered history of drug scandals, from

East Germany’s years of state-sponsored doping

through to the

Balco affair in 2002.

These latest claims could lead to renewed calls for countries to be banned from international competition, and there will be more scrutiny of powerhouse athletics nations like Russia and Kenya. In January, marathon champion

Rita Jeptoo became the 45th Kenyan to fail a doping test,

while 25 Russian walkers have been suspended for doping offences in the past six years.

London 2012’s reputation as the cleanest Games in 50 years will also be questioned, as the sport struggles to assert its credibility and reputation.